BA 560 International Business Law (Discussion question)
Question Description
Saudi Arabia v. Nelson |
1. Read the case summary of Saudi Arabia v. Nelson on pages 515-516 of the textbook
Do you agree with the decision? Why or why not? (Please note: when I ask whether you agree with the Court’s decision, I’m asking for a reason based on your understanding of how the facts relate to the legal principles we have studied, not a personal opinion)
OR
A. Bourjois & Co. v. Katzel |
2. Read the case summary entitled “A. Bourjois & Co. v. Katzel” (1923) on pages 484-485 of the textbook, as well as the information on page 485 regarding the 1988 case, K-mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 486 U.S. 281.
In A. Bourjois & Co. v. Katzel, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the actions of the defendant as an importer of cosmetics from a common French source violated the plaintiff’s trademark. In K-mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that a foreign importer would not violate an American trademark owner if both the owner and the foreign importer were subject to common ownership or control. How are these cases compatible?
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."