• From the first and second e-Activities, describe key strategies that a judge would utilize in order to reconcile the discrepancy in perception of the George Zimmerman’s guilt or innocence. Provide a rationale for your response.
• From the third e-Activity, discuss whether or not you believe Attorney General Eric Holder should have challenged the voting laws in the state of Texas enacted after the Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. Analyze at least two (2) key issues related to Texas’s new voting laws that the Attorney General highlighted. Provide examples of rights covered by the Voting Rights Act to support your rationale.

(Will post e-Activities/video links 1-3 shortly)

Part 2:

Briefly respond to the post of a peer:

Post of a peer: “Hi Classmate and Prof

One key strategy that a select would need to utilize to reconcile the discrepancy of martyr Zimmerman’s innocence is following and imposing the law, and also the means it reads. The woman inside the video expressed it and it happens any time in cases, she aforesaid they’d durable feelings, even knew he was guilty of killing Rayon Martin, but it could not be proved that it fully was intentional and not self-defense. A second key strategy would be emotional restraint. A select hearing all the proof and may conclude a number of people but if the proof does not line up, and prove the explanation to face jail time.

U.S. masterly General Eric Holder strode onto the stage before the National Urban League on Th and declared his intention to need the fight for deciding rights — each almost succeeding Republican sputterings and wistful Democratic musings fed the devoted to each party. Republican leaders, firmly ensconced in power, scolded degree intrusive federal to the delight of the party’s conservative base, whereas Democrats saw Holder as a defender of the rising Hispanic vote which will carry the party back to the secure land. however, the announcement additionally gave sustenance to a military of lawyers engaged in what has become an endless legal battle over election laws and political map-making.In would possibly 2011, Lone-Star State Governor Rick Perry signed a law that needed voters to gift image IDs at polling places, although, below Section four of the decide Rights Act, Lone-Star State had to submit all new decide laws to the Department of Justice before they’re going to get into impact. The department of justice rejected the texas-voter photo ID law finding it discriminator therefore the state was forced to charm in assembly. In 2012, an assembly additionally rejected the law on the grounds that the ID demand would have a disproportionate impact on the operative poor. n last week’s ruling, it threw out the lower court’s call, giving Lone-Star State the likelihood to hold out the strict law, that desires voters to gift a driver’s license, piece license, military ID, a passport or a state-issued “election identification certificate.”

Peer”